I just read that the United Nations seems to view contraception a 'universal human right' and that it should be funded by taxpayers money. To me, a human right is not a tangible that can be bought and paid for and given to everyone at the expense of everyone. Contraception is a choice and if one chooses this avenue to avoid the responsibility of children, then it is something they should be liable for and the costs should come from their own resources. Many, many people do not believe in the early stages of abortion that occur to women on the pill. They aren't preventing other women from using their own form of conscience and using the pill or some other form of contraception but ask that it won't be charged to their income via taxes. Contraception is against the precepts of the Catholic Church and practicing Catholics will not use artificial means with which to either prevent conception or terminate it at any stage.
Now, the United Nations wants to burden everyone with the cost of killing the unborn regardless of morality and beliefs. You have to wonder why one mind set of the population is allowed to dictate the conscience of another? Catholics who practice their Faith will tell you why they don't want to make use of the modern methods of disposing of babies but no one is preventing anyone from making their own decision . . . unless, of course, you are against contraception but forced to help pay for it. Universal humans rights certainly have a very limited perspective.
It is hard to be totally surprised about this latest potential infringement into our personal lives. The Catholic Church already has at least 30 lawsuits pending against the White House over the insurance mandates that go against our freedom of religion. If our children attend public schools, many of them have been exposed to teachings that don't follow our moral code. The problems against people of Faith keep growing . . .
During the recent election, not much was said from the pulpit about voting Catholic . . . so 50% of the Catholics in America, obviously with similar dioceses, voted for the incumbent. Our bishop was strongly behind over turning the death penalty even though it is line with the Church when necessary. The abortion issue was a preliminary sideline. With the United Nation's latest idea, it will be interesting to see how the various bishops handle the situation . . . if at all. Makes you wonder, at times, if they are more afraid of the liberals than they are of God. Let us pray . . .

Msgr. Charles Pope
1. The strained relationship between the Catholic Church in the Democratic party will continue and the strain will likely grow. The reasons for this are that the Democratic Party is increasingly aligning itself with positions that are in direct conflict with Catholic teaching. More of this in the following points.
2. Largely unrestricted abortion will continue unabated, as will funding for organizations such as Planned Parenthood, the chief provider of abortion in this country. Possible Supreme Court nominations will also feature pro-choice jurists. Likewise many Circuit and other Federal District Court judges will continue to be appointed who favor largely unrestricted abortion.
3. The homosexual agenda will continue to grow and receive increasing legal recognition and protection. This includes not only gay “marriage” but also, other issues in the Gay agenda such as adoption, and the general insistence that the Gay lifestyle be promoted in schools and other public settings. This will require Church opposition and generally embroil us in many public disputes. This may have continued even with a Romney win, but there will be fewer political hurdles for such agendas and the pace will be quicker.
4. The HHS mandate moves forward, untouched. Our religious liberty is in greater jeopardy. We’ll have to meet the administration in court. And while the legal basis for our grievance seems strong, recent experience in the courts has demonstrated that nothing is certain. Civil disobedience may be in our future.
5. Extreme debt seems likely to pile up. Well this may not be a specific issue the Catholic Church has spoken to, it remains a fact that we spend money we do not have, and this has moral implications. Little change in a very divided Congress, means there will be likely little progress in arresting a runaway debt. This will become an increasing moral problem that the Church will likely have to address at some level. This too draws us into the morass of debates about spending priorities etc. and may divide us as a Church between fiscal conservatives and those who emphasize the Social Doctrine.
Thus, the next years ahead, will likely draw the Church into increasing conflict with the political scene in general, and the Democratic Party specifically.
And while it is not the instinct to the Church to be drawn into one side of the political debate, moral issues are increasingly demanding from us an unambiguous stance, one which draws us into increasing conflict with the Democratic Party on issues which we consider non-negotiable. At the same time, issues that we may share with the Democratic Party, are less doctrinal or certain for us. We face difficult days ahead, and difficult decisions about strategy and how to engage a party in power that is increasingly at odds with our most central tenants.
The Central question for us is, How will the Church be able to articulate her positions, increasingly at odds with the platform of the Democratic party and be able to resist the (unfair) charge that we are merely the Republican Party at prayer. There are difficult days ahead for the Church.
Let us pray for great courage and prudence.


