John Holdren - White House Czar and Threat to Humanity

If we have been doing our political homework in order to vote responsibility, we should seriously take note of the obama czars with whom our current president has surrounded himself. Not a great bunch but the one we should be most afraid of is John Holdren. There is no hearsay with Mr. Holdren as he long ago wrote a book setting out in detail how he thinks the world should be run and the efficient manner in which this could be accomplished. Titles from science fiction like Brave New World or 1984 come to mind only potential reality is much more frightening. Given that the president knew Mr. Holdren’s ‘credentials' and wanted him as part of his team speaks volumes on future agendas. Just the current mandate requiring everyone to fund contraception and worse announces a beginning enforced compliance. Prayer can turn hearts. Prayer can turn around battles. Looks like prayer is most needed to turn around our world before it is too late.

Here are some direct quotes from Mr. Holdren’s co-authored book, Human Ecology: Problems and Solutions.

"The fetus, given the opportunity to develop properly before birth, and given the essential early socializing experiences and sufficient nourishing food during the crucial early years after birth, will ultimately develop into a human being,"

"It surely is no accident that so many of the most successful individuals are first or only children," wrote Holdren and the Ehrlichs, "nor that children of large families (particularly with more than four children), whatever their economic status, on the average perform less well in school and show lower I.Q. scores than their peers from small families."

"Population control is absolutely essential if the problems now facing mankind are to be solved."

"Political pressure must be applied immediately to induce the United States government to assume its responsibility to halt the growth of the American population,"

"Any set of programs that is to be successful in alleviating the set of problems described in the foregoing chapters must include measures to control the growth of the human population."

"Certain values conflict directly with numbers, although numbers may also be considered a value by some people, such as businessmen (who see bigger markets), politicians (who see more political power), and parents of large families. . ."

"Those who promote numbers of people as a value in itself, however, may be overlooking the cheapness such abundance often bring . . ."

"One form of conflict between values and numbers arises in the choice between having many deprived children or having fewer who can be raised with the best care, education, and opportunity for successful adulthood," they said on pages 228-229. "This dilemma is equally acute whether it is posed to a family or a society. It surely is no accident that so many of the most successful individuals are first or only children; nor that children of large families (particularly with more than four children), whatever their economic status, on the average perform less well in school and show lower I.Q. scores than their peers from small families."

If that wasn’t enough to turn a moral stomach, these ‘rules’ certainly would:


"Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not" •

"The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation's drinking water or in food."

"Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise." •

"People who "contribute to social deterioration" (i.e. undesirables) "can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility" -- in other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized." •

"A transnational "Planetary Regime" should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans' lives -- using an armed international police force."

If the whole world could vote in 2012 . . .

I put up a poll for the 2012 election. If anyone in the world could vote for the next US President, what would your vote be? Thought it would be interesting to see how the world, as a whole, views the current US battle for the vote. It is posted to the upper, right of the page. Just pick a candidate and press the vote button! Any forecasts on the 'winner'?

The first one, especially!

"How vain it is to sit down to write when you have not stood up to live."
-- Henry David Thoreau

"If we were not all so interested in ourselves, life would be so uninteresting that none of us would be able to endure it."
-- Arthur Schopenhauer

"I was the kid next door's imaginary friend."
-- Emo Phillips

"Absurdity, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion."
-- Ambrose Bierce

Our economy . . .

Now, I am not an economic genius but this statement from someone you would think would know better is staggering. No wonder our country is in such a mess!

White House Senior Advisor Valerie Jarrett spoke at the Student Summit at North Carolina Central University and claimed unemployment stimulates the economy.

Her reasoning behind this is people take their unemployment checks and "go out and spend it" which "help(s) stimulate the economy."

"Let's face it, even though we had a terrible economic crisis three years ago, throughout our country many people were suffering before the last three years, particularly in the black community", Jarrett says.

She continues, "And so we need to make sure that we continue to support that important safety net. It not only is good for the family, but it's good for the economy. People who receive that unemployment check go out and spend it and help stimulate the economy, so that's healthy as well."

If I'm thinking correctly, unemployment funds directly or indirectly come from working people's paychecks. It is an insurance of sorts to help people through a tough situation. This is a good thing when used in moderation and as a help not an ongoing life style. How this White House Advisor, Ms. Jarrett can equate the distribution of unemployment funds as a stimulus to the economy is beyond me. Let's see . . . you give money from other working paychecks to people who are not earning paychecks. People with paychecks are, naturally, being more careful so not spending quite as much to make ends meet. So if the unemployed pay benefits go out into the market place, doesn't it kind of leave things where they were to begin with?

I think a prerequisite of getting into any political office should be a couse in basic bookkeeping because it certainly doesn't show up lately in all the payouts in excess of income. Oh, and raising taxes doesn't bring in more revenue because I know that we are spending less and less which does have a grave, trickle-down outcome.

A fresh approach to the current subject . . .

http://www.lifesitenews.com/blog/catholic-priest-gives-obama-mandate-the-finger

Don't worry! The link title might seems a bit 'off' but it doesn't follow through as it states! The priest does a wonderful job of explaining what is wrong with the obama mandate and how every promise he has given the US Citizens has been broken. Where is our media on this? Any other politician just has to clear his throat incorrectly, and they bring up ancient history. This president has recorded, outright lies and the press and media continuously overlook this. Lots of praying for 2012.